nanog mailing list archives
Re: De-funding the ITU
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 14 Jan 2013 15:27:47 -0000
There'd have to be some organization to negotiate and oversee international settlements and other, similar, regulations.Why? The internet has operated just fine without such for quite some time now.
The Internet is held together with spit and duct tape, and sucks for connections that need a stable low-jitter channel, we've all noticed. It has no principle of universal service. The Internet does what it does surprisingly well, but it's not the same kind of network as the phone system. We all know of the abuses that can come with mandatory interconnection and settlements, but the solution is not to cut off the poor countries.
Current thread:
- De-funding the ITU Bill Woodcock (Jan 12)
- Message not available
- Re: De-funding the ITU james jones (Jan 12)
- Message not available
- Re: De-funding the ITU bmanning (Jan 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: De-funding the ITU John Levine (Jan 12)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Fred Baker (fred) (Jan 12)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Bill Woodcock (Jan 12)
- Re: De-funding the ITU bmanning (Jan 13)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Bill Woodcock (Jan 13)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Barry Shein (Jan 13)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Owen DeLong (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU John Levine (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Nick Hilliard (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Wayne E Bouchard (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Eliot Lear (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Fred Baker (fred) (Jan 12)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Owen DeLong (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Bill Woodcock (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Nick Hilliard (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Owen DeLong (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Nick Hilliard (Jan 15)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Eric Brunner-Williams (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU George Herbert (Jan 14)