nanog mailing list archives

Re: Followup: Small City Municipal Broadband


From: Scott Helms <khelms () zcorum com>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 20:08:39 -0500

Jay,

While its certainly technically possible to offer linear video in a shared
network model the content owners have big objections of that.  There really
is no way to do wholesale IPTV except for a very few organizations like the
cable coop (NCTC http://www.nctconline.org/).


On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote:

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brandon Ross" <bross () pobox com>

6) And pursuant to 3, perhaps I could even set up the IPTV service and
resell that to the L3 provider to bundle with their IP service, so
they don't have to do it themselves; while it's not a difficult as I
had gathered, it's still harder than them doing VoIP as part of
their own triple-play.

So you are going to prohibit the operator of the fiber plant from
running layer 3 services, but then turn around and let them offer IPTV?
That
seems quite inconsistent to me. And just because it's "hard"?

No; I wouldn't offer it retail; I'd offer it to all provider-comers
wholesale, at cost plus, just like everything else.

Running a decent layer 3 service is "hard" too. Isn't the whole point to
let these service providers compete with each other on the quality and
cost of their services?

You could say the same thing about the uplink, though; I note you didn't
throw a flag at that, or at Akamai; is the IPTV issue different to you?

Fair point.

Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink
jra () baylink com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC
2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com         2000 Land
Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA               #natog                      +1 727 647
1274




-- 
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
--------------------------------
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
--------------------------------


Current thread: