nanog mailing list archives

Re: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network


From: Scott Helms <khelms () zcorum com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:42:03 -0500

I meant to add in more info, but my mobile Gmail client betrayed me.


On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Scott Helms <khelms () zcorum com> wrote:

Lol, I didn't say all of them were doing that yet.
On Feb 11, 2013 3:50 PM, "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
wrote:

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Scott Helms <khelms () zcorum com> wrote:
If you're a large MSO (say top 15)
then I can see it with today's technology, but even those guys seem to
be
moving in other directions to get out of the provider controlled set top
box model.

really? verizon still wants to sell the hell out of their crappy box
to me... despite the fact that I say: "No, I have a tivo, it works
better...."


Verizon's infrastructure is all RFoG and not IPTV so a cache wouldn't be
useful.




same, btw, for comcast...

They all seem to want to push their own box on users :( to the extent
that they tread the line on legality of pushing away 'cablecard' users
:(


Time Warner is taking a different approach:

http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Roku-and-Time-Warner-Cable-Hook-Up-122690

Also, on Comcast their new STB platform is built around IP
http://xfinity.comcast.net/x1/ and while its still their box they are
trying to build a development ecosystem.



-- 
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
--------------------------------
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
--------------------------------


Current thread: