nanog mailing list archives

[SPAM]RE: [SPAM]RE: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real life experiences?


From: "Dennis Burgess" <dmburgess () linktechs net>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 09:00:17 -0600

We have many with full routing tables.  Load balancing, works fine, I have one site with 8 DSL lines doing balancing 
across them.   We typically don't use a GRE tunnel, but OpenVPN or IPSEC work great.  


Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition"                                 
 Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services                                                             
                       
 Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net - Skype: linktechs                                              
       
 -- Create Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com - 900Mhz - LTE - 3G - 3.65 - TV Whitespace  


-----Original Message-----
From: matt kelly [mailto:mjkelly () gmail com] 
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 8:41 AM
To: Raymond Burkholder
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: [SPAM]RE: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real life experiences?

They can not handle a full routing table. The load balancing doesn't work.
They can not properly reassemble fragmented packets, and therefore drop all but the first "piece". They can not 
reliably handle traffic loads over maybe 200 Mbps, we needed 4-6 Gbps capacity. They can not hold a gre tunnel 
connection.

On Dec 27, 2013 9:07 AM, "Raymond Burkholder" <ray () oneunified net> wrote:


My real world experience with these is that they suck. Plain and simple.
Don't waste your time.

Would you mind elaborating what you were trying to accomplish and what 
failed?

Thank you.

Ray


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by 
MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.





Current thread: