RE: guys != gender neutral

[joseph.snyder () gmail com]

Intention is everything, words are only part of it.  If you can't determine intention and you get upset then it is you 
that has the problem.  Ask or let it go and assume the best intentions.  The world be a lot better off if we all did 
this.

Lorell Hathcock <lorell () hathcock org> wrote:

> We may not all be guys.  We may not all be gals.  But we are definitely
> all
> CLOWNS.  This is a substitution that should be acceptable to all and it
> really works.
>
> Sales-clown.  Yep!
> Mail-clown.  Yep!
> Fire-clown. Yep!
> Police-clown.  Yep!
> Congress-clown.  Yep!  Yep!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Landon Stewart [mailto:lstewart () superb net] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 3:56 PM
> To: Owen DeLong
> Cc: nanog () nanog org
> Subject: Re: guys != gender neutral
>
> On 27 September 2012 11:34, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
>
> > When did "people" stop being an acceptable gender-neutral substitute 
> > for {guys,gals}?
> >
> > Owen
> Using the word 'people' is good but I like to say 'humans'.
>
> What's up humans?
> Can I get you humans to drink?
>
> This rarely offends anyone.
>
> --
> Landon Stewart <LStewart () Superb Net>
> Sr. Administrator
> Systems Engineering
> Superb Internet Corp - 888-354-6128 x 4199 Web hosting and more "Ahead
> of
> the Rest": http://www.superbhosting.net

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.