nanog mailing list archives
Re: guys != gender neutral
From: Landon Stewart <lstewart () superb net>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:55:32 -0700
On 27 September 2012 11:34, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
When did "people" stop being an acceptable gender-neutral substitute for
{guys,gals}?
Owen
Using the word 'people' is good but I like to say 'humans'. What's up humans? Can I get you humans to drink? This rarely offends anyone. -- Landon Stewart <LStewart () Superb Net> Sr. Administrator Systems Engineering Superb Internet Corp - 888-354-6128 x 4199 Web hosting and more "Ahead of the Rest": http://www.superbhosting.net
Current thread:
- really nasty attacks Miguel Mata (Sep 27)
- Re: really nasty attacks Jared Mauch (Sep 27)
- Re: really nasty attacks Stephane Bortzmeyer (Sep 27)
- Re: really nasty attacks Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 27)
- Re: really nasty attacks Jim Mercer (Sep 27)
- guys != gender neutral Jo Rhett (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Owen DeLong (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 27)
- RE: guys != gender neutral Eric Wieling (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Landon Stewart (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jethro R Binks (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Larry Stites (Sep 27)
- Re: really nasty attacks Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 27)
- RE: guys != gender neutral Lorell Hathcock (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Aled Morris (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Brian Henson (Sep 28)
- RE: guys != gender neutral joseph . snyder (Sep 29)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jimmy Hess (Sep 29)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jo Rhett (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral JC Dill (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Brian Christopher Raaen (Sep 27)