nanog mailing list archives
Re: guys != gender neutral
From: Ray Van Dolson <rvandolson () esri com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:28:04 -0700
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 02:57:36PM -0400, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
I really wish people would get over themselves and get to work. Work is a place where things get done, not where people piss and moan about every single perceived slight they can come up with. Andrew
I only wish you had used 'guys' instead of 'people' :) Ray
Current thread:
- Re: guys != gender neutral, (continued)
- Re: guys != gender neutral JC Dill (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Brian Christopher Raaen (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Rob McEwen (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral deleskie (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Kevin Carmical (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Ben Bartsch (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral William Herrin (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jo Rhett (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jason Baugher (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Andrew D Kirch (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Ray Van Dolson (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) bmanning (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) Andrew D Kirch (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) bmanning (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) Andrew D Kirch (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) Doug Barton (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) John Levine (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Scott Howard (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Landon Stewart (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Bjørn Mork (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Eric Parsonage (Sep 28)