nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Ignorance
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:30:21 +0900
In technology, not much. But I'd be pretty surprised if the laws of arithmetic were to change, or if we were to find it useful to assign IP addresses to objects smaller than a single atom.
we assign them /64s
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Michael Thomas (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Jimmy Hess (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Randy Bush (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance joel jaeggli (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance John Mitchell (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance John Levine (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Matthew Kaufman (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Randy Bush (Sep 17)
- RE: IPv6 Ignorance Tomas L. Byrnes (Sep 28)
- RE: IPv6 Ignorance John R. Levine (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance George Herbert (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Jason Leschnik (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Adrian Bool (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance John Mitchell (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Owen DeLong (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Nick Hilliard (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Adrian Bool (Sep 17)
- RE: IPv6 Ignorance Mike Simkins (Sep 17)