nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Ignorance
From: Adrian Bool <aid () logic org uk>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:37:44 +0100
On 17 Sep 2012, at 13:28, John Mitchell <mitch () illuminati org> wrote:
<snip>Given that the first 3 bits of a public IPv6 address are always 001, giving /48 allocations to customers means that service providers will only have 2^(48-3) or 2^45 allocations of /48 to hand out > to a population of approximately 6 billion people. 2^33 is over 8 billion, so assuming a population of 2^33, there will be enough IPv6 /48 allocations to cater for 2^(45-33) or 2^12 or 4096 IPv6 > address allocations per user in the world."</snip>
It seems a tad unfair that the bottom 80 bits are squandered away with a utilisation rate of something closely approximating zero; yet the upper 48 bits are assumed to have zero wastage... Regards, aid
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance joel jaeggli (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance John Mitchell (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance John Levine (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Matthew Kaufman (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Randy Bush (Sep 17)
- RE: IPv6 Ignorance Tomas L. Byrnes (Sep 28)
- RE: IPv6 Ignorance John R. Levine (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance George Herbert (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Jason Leschnik (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Adrian Bool (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance John Mitchell (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Owen DeLong (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Nick Hilliard (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Adrian Bool (Sep 17)
- RE: IPv6 Ignorance Mike Simkins (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Adrian Bool (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance joel jaeggli (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Blake Dunlap (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Mark Blackman (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Owen DeLong (Sep 17)