nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Ignorance
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 07:41:16 +0200 (CEST)
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Randy Bush wrote:
So I agree with you that there is still a risk that this is going to get screwed up, but I don't feel too gloomy yet.yep. but we dis some wisp hacker for saying so. not cool.
I have to admit I never read the forum text so I don't know exactly what was said. I don't see IPv6 getting screwed up the next 50-100 years (even humanity as it is can't be THAT wreckless?), so not adopting IPv6 and clinging to IPv4 for that reason is hard to understand from my point of view.
We know IPv4 isn't enough for our needs, IPv6 might not be the "forever" solution, but it surely scales a lot better than IPv4.
Otoh if I ran a low-cost operations on a shoestring budget I probably wouldn't be adopting IPv6 right now anyway, but for other reasons than IPv6 being "not scalable".
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Jimmy Hess (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance John R. Levine (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Jimmy Hess (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Timothy Morizot (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Owen DeLong (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Randy Bush (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Michael Thomas (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Jimmy Hess (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Randy Bush (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance joel jaeggli (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance John Mitchell (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance John Levine (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Matthew Kaufman (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Randy Bush (Sep 17)
- RE: IPv6 Ignorance Tomas L. Byrnes (Sep 28)
- RE: IPv6 Ignorance John R. Levine (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance George Herbert (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Jason Leschnik (Sep 28)