nanog mailing list archives
Re: Big Temporary Networks
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:47:13 +0100
On 17/09/2012 00:42, Masataka Ohta wrote:
OTOH, IPv6 requires many multicast received by STAs: RA and NS for DAD, for example. Worse, minimum intervals of ND messages are often very large, which means a lot of delay occurs when a message is lost.
So, what you're saying here is that a wifi network with lots of packet loss will cause connectivity problems with ipv6? Nick
Current thread:
- Re: Big Temporary Networks, (continued)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Chris Adams (Sep 14)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Måns Nilsson (Sep 15)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Jay Ashworth (Sep 15)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks William Herrin (Sep 15)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Jay Ashworth (Sep 15)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Masataka Ohta (Sep 15)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Jay Ashworth (Sep 16)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Masataka Ohta (Sep 16)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Nick Hilliard (Sep 16)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Masataka Ohta (Sep 16)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Nick Hilliard (Sep 17)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Masataka Ohta (Sep 17)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks William Herrin (Sep 17)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Masataka Ohta (Sep 18)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks William Herrin (Sep 18)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Nick Hilliard (Sep 18)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks William Herrin (Sep 18)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Seth Mos (Sep 19)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Masataka Ohta (Sep 19)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Sean Harlow (Sep 19)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Masataka Ohta (Sep 19)