nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv4 address length technical design


From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 18:59:20 -0400

On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 17:49:56 -0500, Jimmy Hess said:

  (1)   Stopped  mixing the Host identification and the Network
identification into the same bit field;   instead  every packet gets a
source network address,  destination network address, AND  an
additional  tuple of       Source host address,   destination host
address;  residing in completely separate address spaces,  with  no
"Netmasks",  "Prefix lengths", or other comingling of  network
addresses and host address spaces.

Where's Noel Chiappa when you need him?

  (2)  The new protocol will use  variable-length address for the Host
portion, such as  used in the addresses of CLNP,

This also was considered during the IPv6 design phase, and the router
designers had a collective cow, as it makes ASIC design a whole lot more
interesting.  And back then, line speed was a lot lower than it is now...

Not saying it can't be done - but you're basically going to have to do CLNP
style handling at 400Gbits or 1Tbit.  Better get those ASIC designers a *lot*
of caffeine, they're gonna need it...

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: