nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv4 address length technical design


From: joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 08:15:29 -0700

On 10/4/12 1:31 AM, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
On Oct 4, 2012, at 12:21 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:

IEEE 802 was expected to provide unique numbers for all computers ever built.

Internet was expected to provide unique numbers for all computers actively on the network.

Obviously, over time, the latter would be a declining percentage of the former since the former is increasing and never 
decrements while the latter could (theoretically) have a growth rate on either side of zero and certainly has some 
decrements even if the increments exceed the decrements.
Which brings the question, are we expected to ever run out of the 48 bits for mac-addresses? Of course there are 
exceptions, but in most cases you can probably start recycling them after a certain period. And that period could even 
become shorter over time, I mean what are the chances you find a iPhone 1 in your network these days?

The IEEE/RAC regards the consistent enforcement of these restrictions as a
fundamental and realistic basis for ensuring longevity of the EUI-48 identifier capability, with a target lifetime of 100 years for existing applications using EUI-48
identifiers.

http://standards.ieee.org/develop/regauth/tut/eui.pdf

Marco




Current thread: