nanog mailing list archives
Re: 100.100.0.0/24
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:44:04 +0100
On 16/10/2012 11:37, Lowe, Richard B wrote:
Kind of like the 192.0.2.1/32 for IPv4, huh?
no - 192.0.2.0/24 is formally "TEST-NET-1, documentation and examples", like 2001:db8::/32. 100::/64 is specifically for discard and analysis style RTBHs. I.e. for ipv6, you can now keep your documentation prefixes on your documentation. Nick
RFC: 5635 -----Original Message----- From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:nick () foobar org] Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2012 6:40 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: 100.100.0.0/24 On 07/10/2012 00:34, Randy Bush wrote:ipv6 route 2001:DB8:0:DEAD:BEEF::1/128 Null0plug: rfc 6666. 100::/64 is reserved for this purpose. Nick
Current thread:
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24, (continued)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 joel jaeggli (Oct 05)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Christopher Morrow (Oct 05)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Jared Mauch (Oct 05)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Ben Bartsch (Oct 05)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Jared Mauch (Oct 05)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Brett Frankenberger (Oct 06)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Randy Bush (Oct 06)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Vasil Kolev (Oct 06)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Randy Bush (Oct 06)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Nick Hilliard (Oct 07)
- Message not available
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Nick Hilliard (Oct 16)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 joel jaeggli (Oct 05)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 joel jaeggli (Oct 05)
- Re: 100.100.0.0/24 Randy Bush (Oct 05)