nanog mailing list archives

Re: 100.100.0.0/24


From: joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 05:29:54 -0700

On 10/5/12 5:08 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
http://bgp.he.net/net/100.100.0.0/24#_bogon

A surprising number of large transit ASes appear to be more than willing
to accept this prefix from AS4847.
a private address space leak?  and propagated.  i am deeply shocked.

wtf did people think would happen?
I'm unsurprised that not all filters are in place, more or less where they weren't however is another matter.

by all accounts this has been advertised since 8/24.

randy




Current thread: