nanog mailing list archives
Re: Detection of Rogue Access Points
From: David Cantrell <david () cantrell org uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:38:43 +0100
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 09:00:56AM -0700, Joe Hamelin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Roy <r.engehausen () gmail com> wrote:Why not give them wireless Internet access only? That will keep all the smartphone users happy.Maybe because he has 130 sites and 130 truck rolls is not cheap. Also company policy says no.
So stick a pre-configured device in the post, with instructions on how and where to plug it in. -- David Cantrell | top google result for "topless karaoke murders" "Cynical" is a word used by the naive to describe the experienced. George Hills, in uknot
Current thread:
- Re: Detection of Rogue Access Points, (continued)
- Re: Detection of Rogue Access Points Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 15)
- Re: Detection of Rogue Access Points Jonathan Rogers (Oct 15)
- Re: Detection of Rogue Access Points Roy (Oct 15)
- Re: Detection of Rogue Access Points Joe Hamelin (Oct 15)
- Re: Detection of Rogue Access Points Sean Harlow (Oct 15)
- Re: Detection of Rogue Access Points Joe Hamelin (Oct 15)
- Re: Detection of Rogue Access Points Sean Harlow (Oct 15)
- Re: Detection of Rogue Access Points Ryan McBride (Oct 16)
- Re: Detection of Rogue Access Points George Herbert (Oct 15)
- Re: Detection of Rogue Access Points Sean Harlow (Oct 15)
- Re: Detection of Rogue Access Points Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 15)
- Re: Detection of Rogue Access Points David Cantrell (Oct 16)
- Re: Detection of Rogue Access Points Jonathan Rogers (Oct 18)
- RE: Detection of Rogue Access Points Raymond Burkholder (Oct 18)
- Re: Detection of Rogue Access Points Phil Regnauld (Oct 18)