nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 address length technical design
From: Izaac <izaac () setec org>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 15:22:21 -0400
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:52:57PM +0200, Seth Mos wrote:
"Pick a number between this and that." It's the 80's and you can still count the computers in the world. :)
And yet, almost concurrently, IEEE 802 went with forty-eight bits. Go figure. I'm pretty sure the explanation you're looking for is: It was with the word size of the most popular minis and micros at the time. -- . ___ ___ . . ___ . \ / |\ |\ \ . _\_ /__ |-\ |-\ \__
Current thread:
- IPv4 address length technical design Chris Campbell (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Sadiq Saif (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Kevin Broderick (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Seth Mos (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Izaac (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design George Herbert (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design William Herrin (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Owen DeLong (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Marco Hogewoning (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design joel jaeggli (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Kevin Broderick (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Sadiq Saif (Oct 03)
- RE: IPv4 address length technical design Naslund, Steve (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Jeroen van Aart (Oct 29)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design George Herbert (Oct 03)
- RE: IPv4 address length technical design Tony Patti (Oct 03)