nanog mailing list archives
Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 08:19:18 +0900
valdis.kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
An IPv4 home address may be shared by many mobile terminals distinguished by port numbers, which is why IPv6 is not necessary.An IPv4 address can also be shared by many mobile terminals distinguished by AOL userids. How did that work out?
The point is that all the transport layer protocol have port numbers. So, if you have a stable IP address and, say, 256 stable port numbers, your mobile device running applications as a server, can be reached by the port number, distinguished from other mobile devices sharing the IP address. Such a service might cost $10 a month or Gree might offer it free of charge. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers, (continued)
- Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers Randy Carpenter (May 22)
- Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers Derek Ivey (May 22)
- Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers Christopher Morrow (May 22)
- Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers Christopher Morrow (May 22)
- Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers Randy Carpenter (May 22)
- Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers Christopher Morrow (May 22)
- Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers Masataka Ohta (May 24)
- Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers Christopher Morrow (May 25)
- Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers Masataka Ohta (May 25)
- Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers valdis . kletnieks (May 25)
- Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers Masataka Ohta (May 25)
- Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers valdis . kletnieks (May 25)
- Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers Joel jaeggli (May 25)
- Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers Christopher Morrow (May 25)
- Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers Arturo Servin (May 25)
- Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers Matt Ryanczak (May 26)
- Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers Arturo Servin (May 26)
- RE: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers Jamie Bowden (May 23)
- RE: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers Frank Bulk - iName.com (May 23)
- RE: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers Tim Jackson (May 23)
- Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers Randy Carpenter (May 23)