Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

[Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>]

Christopher Morrow wrote:

> > > It certainly does not work on the iPad "3" in Ohio. Not only
> > > that, but I can't even pay them to give me a stable IPv4
> > > address, because if you get a static IP, it disables the
> > > hotspot functionality. Head-->Wall.
> >
> > The proper way to have a static IP address is not to pay mobile
> > operators but to run mobile IP or something like that on your
> > terminal.
> >
> > You can run your home agent at your home or office.
>
> that seems super scalable and easy for 'people' to do ...

For people of NANOG, certainly.

Or, there can be commercial home agent service providers,
which may not be identical to your mobile operator, which
is something like MVNO over the Internet.

For NAT penetration, mobile tunneling of IP over TCP/UDP is
necessary.

An IPv4 home address may be shared by many mobile
terminals distinguished by port numbers, which is
why IPv6 is not necessary.

                                                Masataka Ohta