nanog mailing list archives
Re: BCP38 Deployment
From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:50:04 -0700
On Mar 28, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Darius Jahandarie wrote:
I think the concern of RFC3704/BCP84, i.e., multihoming, is the primary reason we don't see ingress filtering as much as we should.
I would be surprised if this were true. I'd argue that today, the vast majority of devices on the Internet (and certainly the ones that are used in massive D(D)oS attacks) are found hanging off singly-homed networks. Regards, -drc
Current thread:
- BCP38 Deployment Bingyang LIU (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 Deployment Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 Deployment Leo Bicknell (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 Deployment David Conrad (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 Deployment Bingyang LIU (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 Deployment Ray Soucy (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 Deployment Joe Greco (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 Deployment Leo Bicknell (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 Deployment Darius Jahandarie (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 Deployment David Conrad (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 Deployment Darius Jahandarie (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 Deployment Bingyang LIU (Mar 28)
- RE: BCP38 Deployment Drew Weaver (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 Deployment Leo Bicknell (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 Deployment Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 Deployment Michael Thomas (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 Deployment Leo Bicknell (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 Deployment Michael Thomas (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 Deployment Leo Bicknell (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 Deployment Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 Deployment David Conrad (Mar 28)
- Re: BCP38 Deployment Leo Bicknell (Mar 28)