Re: BCP38 Deployment

[Bingyang LIU <bjornliu () gmail com>]

Yep, one way is to give economic penalty.

But how about giving the _good_ ISPs economic reward? Say, some
transit ISPs deploy anti-spoofing techniques (e.g. uRPF), but only
filter those spoofing packets whose destination is the ASes having
purchased their *anti-spoofing service* ?

Bingyang

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:41 PM,  <goemon () anime net> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, David Conrad wrote:
> > Actually, given the uptick in spoofing-based DoS attacks, the ease in
> > which such attacks can be generated, recent high profile targets of said
> > attacks, and the full-on money pumping freakout about anything with "cyber-"
> > tacked on the front, I suspect a likely outcome will be proposals for
> > legislation forcing ISPs to do something like BCP38.
>
>
> Exactly.
>
> Either do it voluntarily or it will be done for you involuntarily at the
> federal level and you will have nobody but yourselves to blame.
>
> The choice is yours.
>
> -Dan



-- 
Bingyang Liu
Network Architecture Lab, Network Center,Tsinghua Univ.
Beijing, China
Home Page: http://netarchlab.tsinghua.edu.cn/~liuby