nanog mailing list archives
Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:18:04 +0900
Randy Bush wrote:
none of which seem to move us forward. i guess the lesson is that, as long as we are well below moore, we just keep going down the slippery, and damned expensive, slope.
As long as we keep using IPv4, we are mostly stopping at /24 and must stop at /32. But, see the subject. It's well above moore. For high speed (fixed time) routed look up with 1M entries, SRAM is cheap at /24 and is fine at /32 but expensive and power consuming TCAM is required at /48. That's one reason why we should stay away from IPv6. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary, (continued)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 15)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 15)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Geoff Huston (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Leo Bicknell (Mar 13)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 13)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 13)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Randy Bush (Mar 13)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Geoff Huston (Mar 13)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Randy Bush (Mar 13)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Leo Bicknell (Mar 13)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 14)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Eugen Leitl (Mar 15)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 15)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Eugen Leitl (Mar 15)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 15)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Eugen Leitl (Mar 15)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Scott Brim (Mar 15)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 15)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 15)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary james machado (Mar 15)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 15)