Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary

[Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>]

Eugen Leitl wrote:

> > For high speed (fixed time) routed look up with 1M entries, SRAM is
> > cheap at /24 and is fine at /32 but expensive and power consuming
> > TCAM is required at /48.
> >
> > That's one reason why we should stay away from IPv6.
>
> What prevents you from using
> http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v1/n6/full/ncomms1063.html
> with IPv6?

Though I didn't paid $32 to read the full paper, it's like
a proposal of geography based addressing.

So, I should ask what prevents you from using it with IPv4?

                                                Masataka Ohta