nanog mailing list archives
Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:06:07 -0800
On Mar 9, 2012, at 11:01 PM, George Bonser wrote:
I haven't heard anyone advocate accepting less than a /48. I think /48 is a reasonable "You must be this tall to ride" barrier. Beyond that, YMMV. OwenApparently AS6939 has at various times :) I remember getting some /64 announcements from HE. I haven't seen one lately, though. I'm only filtering one /64 route these days announced by AS4651
Like any other ISP, we're run by humans and humans occasionally make mistakes. If you saw anything longer than a /64 from 6939, it was the result of such an event. If you see anything longer than a /64 from 6939, please let us know and we will fix it. We have never advocated accepting longer than /48s to my knowledge. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary, (continued)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Bernhard Schmidt (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary PC (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Bernhard Schmidt (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Bernhard Schmidt (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary PC (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Bernhard Schmidt (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jimmy Hess (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sander Steffann (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jimmy Hess (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Herbert (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Leo Vegoda (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Randy Bush (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)