nanog mailing list archives
Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: Bernhard Schmidt <berni () birkenwald de>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 17:08:03 +0100
On 09.03.2012 17:04, PC wrote:
I think ARIN issues /48s for Provider independent space as the minimum allocation size, so I'm guessing we shouldn't filter below that. At least, that's what's in their current policies.
Note that I explicitly wrote: | I used to be (or still am) on the same page as you are. I was | dropping everything smaller than a /36 from PA ranges at the edge. ^^^^^^^Of course I'm accepting /48 from PI range (in ARIN world 2001:500::/30 2001:504::/30 and 2620::/23), anything else would be quite brain-dead and stupid.
Bernhard
Current thread:
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jeff Wheeler (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jeroen Massar (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Bernhard Schmidt (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary PC (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Bernhard Schmidt (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Bernhard Schmidt (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary PC (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jimmy Hess (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sander Steffann (Mar 09)