nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS poisoning at Google?
From: TR Shaw <tshaw () oitc com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 07:50:19 -0400
On Jun 27, 2012, at 3:36 AM, Michael J Wise wrote:
On Jun 27, 2012, at 12:06 AM, Matthew Black wrote:We found the aberrant .htaccess file and have removed it. What a mess!Trusting you carefully noted the date/time stamp before removing it, as that's an important bit of forensics.
And done forget there is a trail on that file on your backups. Tom
Current thread:
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google?, (continued)
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Christopher Morrow (Jun 26)
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Landon Stewart (Jun 26)
- RE: DNS poisoning at Google? Matthew Black (Jun 26)
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Grant Ridder (Jun 26)
- Message not available
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Grant Ridder (Jun 26)
- RE: DNS poisoning at Google? Matthew Black (Jun 27)
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Bryan Irvine (Jun 27)
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Ishmael Rufus (Jun 27)
- RE: DNS poisoning at Google? Ian McDonald (Jun 27)
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Michael J Wise (Jun 27)
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? TR Shaw (Jun 27)
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? AP NANOG (Jun 27)
- RE: DNS poisoning at Google? Matthew Black (Jun 27)
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Bryan Irvine (Jun 27)
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Jason Hellenthal (Jun 26)
- Re: No DNS poisoning at Google (in case of trouble, blame the DNS) Daniel Rohan (Jun 27)
- Re: No DNS poisoning at Google (in case of trouble, blame the DNS) Arturo Servin (Jun 27)
- Re: No DNS poisoning at Google (in case of trouble, blame the DNS) Jason Hellenthal (Jun 27)
- Re: No DNS poisoning at Google (in case of trouble, blame the DNS) Ryan Rawdon (Jun 27)