nanog mailing list archives

Re: DNS poisoning at Google?

From: Michael J Wise <mjwise () kapu net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 00:36:43 -0700


On Jun 27, 2012, at 12:06 AM, Matthew Black wrote:

We found the aberrant .htaccess file and have removed it. What a mess!



Trusting you carefully noted the date/time stamp before removing it, as that's an important bit of forensics.

Aloha,
Michael.
-- 
"Please have your Internet License             
 and Usenet Registration handy..."

Current thread:

RE: DNS poisoning at Google?, (continued)
- - - RE: DNS poisoning at Google? Matthew Black (Jun 26)
    - Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Christopher Morrow (Jun 26)
    - Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Landon Stewart (Jun 26)
    - RE: DNS poisoning at Google? Matthew Black (Jun 26)
    - Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Grant Ridder (Jun 26)
    - Message not available
    - Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Grant Ridder (Jun 26)
    - RE: DNS poisoning at Google? Matthew Black (Jun 27)
    - Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Bryan Irvine (Jun 27)
    - Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Ishmael Rufus (Jun 27)
    - RE: DNS poisoning at Google? Ian McDonald (Jun 27)
    - Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Michael J Wise (Jun 27)
    - Re: DNS poisoning at Google? TR Shaw (Jun 27)
    - Re: DNS poisoning at Google? AP NANOG (Jun 27)
    - RE: DNS poisoning at Google? Matthew Black (Jun 27)
    - Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Bryan Irvine (Jun 27)
    - Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Jason Hellenthal (Jun 26)
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Kevin Day (Jun 26)
- No DNS poisoning at Google (in case of trouble, blame the DNS) Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jun 27)
  - Re: No DNS poisoning at Google (in case of trouble, blame the DNS) Daniel Rohan (Jun 27)
    - Re: No DNS poisoning at Google (in case of trouble, blame the DNS) Arturo Servin (Jun 27)
    - Re: No DNS poisoning at Google (in case of trouble, blame the DNS) Jason Hellenthal (Jun 27)

(Thread continues...)