nanog mailing list archives

Re: DNS poisoning at Google?

From: Bryan Irvine <sparctacus () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:35:51 -0700

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Matthew Black <Matthew.Black () csulb edu> wrote:

Yes, we did that and also noted the username and IP address from where the FTP upload originated.


It came from an FTP upload?  Why I outta ...  ;-)

Current thread:

Re: DNS poisoning at Google?, (continued)
- - - Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Grant Ridder (Jun 26)
    - Message not available
    - Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Grant Ridder (Jun 26)
    - RE: DNS poisoning at Google? Matthew Black (Jun 27)
    - Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Bryan Irvine (Jun 27)
    - Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Ishmael Rufus (Jun 27)
    - RE: DNS poisoning at Google? Ian McDonald (Jun 27)
    - Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Michael J Wise (Jun 27)
    - Re: DNS poisoning at Google? TR Shaw (Jun 27)
    - Re: DNS poisoning at Google? AP NANOG (Jun 27)
    - RE: DNS poisoning at Google? Matthew Black (Jun 27)
    - Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Bryan Irvine (Jun 27)
    - Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Jason Hellenthal (Jun 26)
- Re: DNS poisoning at Google? Kevin Day (Jun 26)
- No DNS poisoning at Google (in case of trouble, blame the DNS) Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jun 27)
  - Re: No DNS poisoning at Google (in case of trouble, blame the DNS) Daniel Rohan (Jun 27)
    - Re: No DNS poisoning at Google (in case of trouble, blame the DNS) Arturo Servin (Jun 27)
    - Re: No DNS poisoning at Google (in case of trouble, blame the DNS) Jason Hellenthal (Jun 27)
    - Re: No DNS poisoning at Google (in case of trouble, blame the DNS) Ryan Rawdon (Jun 27)
    - Re: No DNS poisoning at Google (in case of trouble, blame the DNS) Ryan Rawdon (Jun 27)
    - RE: No DNS poisoning at Google (in case of trouble, blame the DNS) Matthew Black (Jun 27)
    - RE: No DNS poisoning at Google (in case of trouble, blame the DNS) Matthew Black (Jun 27)

(Thread continues...)