RE: IPv6 day and tunnels

["Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin () boeing com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Masataka Ohta [mailto:mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 4:47 AM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: Owen DeLong; nanog () nanog org
> Subject: Re: IPv6 day and tunnels
>
> Templin, Fred L wrote:
>
> > If you wish, you can also consider Alternate 3 for 9kB:
> > 72us@1Gbps, 7.2us@10Gbps, .72us@100Gbps, .072us@1Tbps.
>
> So?
>
> Have you learned enough about Moore's law that, at 10Gbps
> era, 72us of delay is often significant?

I frankly haven't thought about it any further. You say
1280+ belongs in ITU, and I say 1280- belongs in ATM.
Larger packets means fewer interrupts and fewer packets
in flight, which is good Moore's law or no. Accommodation
of MTU diversity is what matters.

Fred
fred.l.templin () boeing com

>                                               Masataka Ohta