nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 day and tunnels
From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon () ttec com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 11:09:27 -0400
Owen DeLong wrote:
There should be no such thing as packet fragmentation in the current protocol. What is needed is for people to simply configure things correctly and allow PTB messages to pass as designed. Owen
You are absolutely correct. Are you talking about IPv4 or IPv6? Joe
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Masataka Ohta (Jun 06)
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 07)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Masataka Ohta (Jun 12)
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Masataka Ohta (Jun 12)
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Masataka Ohta (Jun 12)
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Masataka Ohta (Jun 19)
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 19)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Joe Maimon (Jun 04)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Cameron Byrne (Jun 04)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels bmanning (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Jeroen Massar (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Jeroen Massar (Jun 03)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Masataka Ohta (Jun 04)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Jeroen Massar (Jun 04)