Re: job screening question

[Randy <randy_94108 () yahoo com>]

--- On Thu, 7/5/12, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:

> From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
> Subject: Re: job screening question
> To: "Randy" <randy_94108 () yahoo com>
> Cc: "nanog () nanog org" <nanog () nanog org>
> Date: Thursday, July 5, 2012, 7:36 PM
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:10 PM,
> Randy <randy_94108 () yahoo com>
> wrote:
> > How about another HR-Question:
> >
> > what do 0.0.0.0/1 and 128.0.0.0.0/1 as static-routes
> accomplish?
>
> Override the dynamic (e.g. DHCP) default route. Often so you
> can
> implement a workaround that central Network Security
> wouldn't approve
> of. :-)

<smile>
Yes of course! But NOT the "answer" I am looking for(..and want to hear..) because -

1) having such default-routes "internally" is a terribly-bad/broken idea.

I am looking for a "candidate" who can actually say the same and go on to say: "it is a kludge that can be put in place 
to load-share between two links to upstreams when "budgetary-constraints" prevent us from anything but static-routing - 
two upstreams terminating on the same router.

There You go:

So, There are some questions (includes Your original-question) that HR should not be asking.

There is a big difference between Engineering-Management and Management-Engineering.....(Morton Thiokol/Challenger is a 
classic case in point.)
Regards,
./Randy


> Regards,
> Bill Herrin
>
> -- 
> William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com 
> bill () herrin us
> 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004