Re: 10G switchrecommendaton

[Tim Vollebregt <tim () interworx nl>]

2,5MB shared approximately.

Aggregating 10G with microbursts is definately a no-go on such box.

-Tim

On 27-01-12 12:33, James Braunegg wrote:
> How small is the buffer on the EX4500 ??
>
> Kindest Regards
>
> James Braunegg
> W:  1300 769 972  |  M:  0488 997 207 |  D:  (03) 9751 7616
> E:   james.braunegg () micron21 com  |  ABN:  12 109 977 666  
>
>
>
> This message is intended for the addressee named above. It may contain privileged or confidential information. If you 
> are not the intended recipient of this message you must not use, copy, distribute or disclose it to anyone other than 
> the addressee. If you have received this message in error please return the message to the sender by replying to it and 
> then delete the message from your computer.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Vollebregt [mailto:tim () interworx nl]
> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 8:35 PM
> To: nanog () nanog org
> Subject: Re: 10G switchrecommendaton
>
> I would not recommend EX4500 as an 10G aggregator switch, it has really small buffers.
>
> EX3300 as TOR
> EX82** as 10G aggregator
>
> -Tim
>
> On 26-01-12 22:13, Raul Rodriguez wrote:
> > Juniper EX4500.
> >
> > -RR
> >
> > On 1/26/12, Deric Kwok<deric.kwok2000 () gmail com>   wrote:
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > I would like to have 10G switchrecommendaton Ipref software can test
> > > around 9.2G but we can have congestion over 6G in single port!
> > >
> > > Thank you