nanog mailing list archives
Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka () globaltransit net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:58:45 +0800
On Friday, January 20, 2012 04:34:56 AM Thomas Donnelly wrote:
The warm standby IOS is a nice feature for in service upgrades and crash avoidance.
Except that some times, it did lead to crash (for us anyway), because it eats up half the router's memory, and if you're running 3x full tables or more, you ran out of the other half and BOOM! And that was IOS XR 2, which is generally old now. We now turn off software redundancy now on all ASR1000 boxes that don't have a 2nd RP. Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 jon Heise (Jan 19)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Thomas Donnelly (Jan 19)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Mark Tinka (Jan 23)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 amaged (Jan 23)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Mark Tinka (Jan 23)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Mark Tinka (Jan 23)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Thomas Donnelly (Jan 19)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 PC (Jan 19)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Josh Hoppes (Jan 19)
- RE: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Leigh Porter (Jan 19)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Ariel Biener (Jan 19)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Skeeve Stevens (Jan 19)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Mark Tinka (Jan 23)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Ariel Biener (Jan 19)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 Saku Ytti (Jan 20)
- Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000 PC (Jan 20)