nanog mailing list archives
Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked
From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:59:30 -0500
Randy Bush <randy () psg com> writes:
well, not exactly. to quote myself from the other week in another forum [ 30 lines deleted ] Sorry to drone on, but these three really need to be differentiated.
The truly wonderful thing about the evolution of BGP security is its elegant simplicity. It is good to know that the barriers to entry for the IRR system (templates, objects, "Dear Colleague" emails from the auto-dbm robot, etc) have been eradicated in favor of simple, easy-to-understand and maintain maintain digital certificate chains. I predict epic uptake the likes of which we haven't seen since I filed my last NACR. -r
Current thread:
- Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Milo Medin (Feb 01)
- RE: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked George Bonser (Feb 01)
- Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Joe Provo (Feb 02)
- Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked goemon (Feb 02)
- Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Randy Bush (Feb 02)
- Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Joel jaeggli (Feb 02)
- Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Randy Bush (Feb 02)
- Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 03)
- Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Joe Provo (Feb 02)
- RE: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked George Bonser (Feb 01)