nanog mailing list archives
Re: rpki vs. secure dns?
From: Dmitry Burkov <dburk () burkov aha ru>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:55:26 +0400
Randy - you know that I'm enough stupid- means straightforward - may be the way is not only technical (recomendations design) - but also to combine with some policy changes as splitting allocations and assignments (may be changing who is responsible for what?) Or we follow the traditional way(means hierarchy) or we are capable to introduce one more level for flexebility - we should be honest that all techinical design just follows some political or quasi-political decisions. But I think it can be changed. Dima On Apr 30, 2012, at 7:46 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
We need more flexible, distributed architecture behind - no matter - which interests will be lobbied as we have got already.as i agree that there is a problem, i *very* eagerly await your proposal randy
Current thread:
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns?, (continued)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (Apr 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Nick Hilliard (Apr 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Florian Weimer (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Nick Hilliard (Apr 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Alex Band (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Danny McPherson (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Dmitry Burkov (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Jared Mauch (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Christopher Morrow (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Dmitry Burkov (Apr 30)
- Message not available
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 28)
- Message not available
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Alex Band (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Phil Regnauld (Apr 30)