nanog mailing list archives
Re: rpki vs. secure dns?
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 13:59:39 +0200
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 03:04:07AM -0700, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote a message of 9 lines which said:
draft-bates-bgp4-nlri-orig-verif-00.txt was '98 and we dropped it for good reasons
Unfortunately, we have RFCs for good ideas but bad ideas never get documented by the IETF (one of the few exceptions is RFC 3197). So, bad ideas keep coming back and back again. Would you explain in a few words why this was a bad idea? I personally find Rover a very interesting idea, and which seems realistic.
Current thread:
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns?, (continued)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Nick Hilliard (Apr 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Florian Weimer (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Nick Hilliard (Apr 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Alex Band (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Danny McPherson (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Dmitry Burkov (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Jared Mauch (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Christopher Morrow (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Dmitry Burkov (Apr 30)
- Message not available
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 28)
- Message not available
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Alex Band (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Phil Regnauld (Apr 30)