nanog mailing list archives
Re: flow generating tool
From: Vlad Galu <galu () packetdam com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:30:33 +0200
On Sep 26, 2011, at 4:02 PM, Jason Leschnik wrote:
Does anyone follow a network performance testing methodology, using hardware from companies like ixia/spirent? I know that basic testing is typically done for validation of configs, but i assume other issues would make themselves apparent when pushed to these higher loads. thoughts/comments? Thanks
It really depends on the product you are testing. If forwarding performance is what you want to measure, you would do it with various routing table sizes (starting small and ending with a global table). Packet size is also something you should look at. We could provide better suggestions if you tell us what your product is. Vlad Galu galu () packetdam com
Current thread:
- Re: flow generating tool, (continued)
- Re: flow generating tool George Jones (Sep 26)
- RE: flow generating tool Erik Bais (Sep 26)
- Re: flow generating tool Thomas Maufer (Sep 26)
- Re: flow generating tool Eddie Parra (Sep 26)
- Re: flow generating tool Mathias Wolkert (Sep 27)
- Re: flow generating tool james machado (Sep 27)
- Re: flow generating tool Rafael Rodriguez (Sep 27)
- Re: flow generating tool jiaruchen (Sep 26)
- Re: flow generating tool Jason Leschnik (Sep 26)
- Re: flow generating tool George Jones (Sep 26)
- Re: flow generating tool Vlad Galu (Sep 26)
- RE: flow generating tool Chuck Reynolds (Sep 26)
- RE: flow generating tool Jonathon Exley (Sep 26)
- Re: flow generating tool Jason Leschnik (Sep 26)