nanog mailing list archives

RE: flow generating tool


From: Jonathon Exley <Jonathon.Exley () kordia co nz>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:45:24 +1300

The test plan you use depends upon what you want to test - raw pps throughput, route convergence time, qos performance, 
etc.
We use Exfo (http://www.exfo.com) testers working to a mac-swap loopback for commissioning testing of Ethernet access 
circuits, looking at the usual loss/throughput/latency/jitter metrics and burst size.
When checking out new equipment in the lab we also use scapy scripts (http://www.secdev.org/projects/scapy/) to look at 
things like Ethertype and L2CP transparency.

Jonathon 


-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Leschnik [mailto:leschnik () gmail com] 
Sent: Tuesday, 27 September 2011 3:02 a.m.
To: jiaruchen () gmail com
Cc: George Jones; nanog () nanog org; Naiden Dimitrov
Subject: Re: flow generating tool

Does anyone follow a network performance testing methodology, using hardware from companies like ixia/spirent?

I know that basic testing is typically done for validation of configs, but i assume other issues would make themselves 
apparent when pushed to these higher loads.

thoughts/comments?

Thanks

--
Regards,
Jason Leschnik.

[m] 0432 35 4224
[w@] jason dot leschnik <at> ansto dot gov dot au<jason.leschnik () ansto gov au> [U@] jml974 () uow edu au
This email and attachments: are confidential; may be protected by privilege and copyright; if received in error may not 
be used, copied, or kept; are not guaranteed to be virus-free; may not express the views of Kordia(R); do not designate 
an information system; and do not give rise to any liability for Kordia(R).



Current thread: