nanog mailing list archives
Re: vyatta for bgp
From: Brandon Galbraith <brandon.galbraith () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:41:12 -0700
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Andreas Echavez <andreas () livejournalinc com
wrote:
The most reliable/cost effective solution is the cheap and redundant approach to architecture. Reliable hardware is incredibly inexpensive, and every year we get better CPUs and (recently) GPUs that are providing APIs and interfaces to their incredible parallel processing capability. -Andreas
+1 Scaling Horizontally. Applies to your networking gear, your applications, etc. If you assume anything is going to break, just get more and scale/architect properly.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Alain Hebert <ahebert () pubnix net> wrote:Hi, As usual this end-up in what people prefer. Vyatta is as good as the hardware it runs on, the backend they use and the people configuring/maintaining it. The nature of ASIC make it more reliable than a multi-purpose device (aka server) running an OS written for it. It end up being a choice between risk and cost and being that you can get your hand on second hand iron for cheap these days... Why risk it. ----- Alain Hebert ahebert () pubnix net PubNIX Inc. 50 boul. St-Charles P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443 On 09/15/11 09:05, Ray Soucy wrote:Is Vyatta really not suited for the task? I keep checking up on it and holding off looking into it as they don't support multicast yet. Modern commodity sever hardware these days often out-powers big iron enough to make up for not using ASICs, though, at least on the lower end of the spectrum. Does anyone have any more details on Vyatta not scaling? Were you trying to run it as a VM? What were you using for NICs? etc. The hardware matters. Saying Vyatta doesn't cut it could meananything...On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Dobbins, Roland<rdobbins () arbor net> wrote:On Sep 14, 2011, at 5:54 AM, Deepak Jain wrote: Some enterprises get MPLS L3 VPN service from their providers, andneedboxes that can route packets to it and speak BGP to inject theirroutes.They are not, per se, connected to the Internet, and thus won't be "zorched", at least in the sense you are using it.Hence 'public-facing'. ;> ------------------------------**------------------------------** ----------- Roland Dobbins<rdobbins () arbor net> //<http://www.arbornetworks.**com<http://www.arbornetworks.com>The basis of optimism is sheer terror. -- Oscar Wilde
-- Brandon Galbraith US Voice: 630.492.0464
Current thread:
- Re: vyatta for bgp, (continued)
- Re: vyatta for bgp Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 13)
- Re: vyatta for bgp Dobbins, Roland (Sep 12)
- RE: vyatta for bgp Chuck Church (Sep 12)
- Re: vyatta for bgp Dobbins, Roland (Sep 12)
- Re: vyatta for bgp Leo Bicknell (Sep 13)
- RE: vyatta for bgp Deepak Jain (Sep 13)
- Re: vyatta for bgp Dobbins, Roland (Sep 13)
- Re: vyatta for bgp Ray Soucy (Sep 15)
- Re: vyatta for bgp Alain Hebert (Sep 15)
- Re: vyatta for bgp Andreas Echavez (Sep 21)
- Re: vyatta for bgp Brandon Galbraith (Sep 21)
- Re: vyatta for bgp Charles N Wyble (Sep 21)
- RE: vyatta for bgp Pierce Lynch (Sep 22)
- Re: vyatta for bgp Charles N Wyble (Sep 22)
- Re: vyatta for bgp Scott Whyte (Sep 22)
- Re: vyatta for bgp Ray Soucy (Sep 26)
- Re: vyatta for bgp Jason Leschnik (Sep 15)
- Re: vyatta for bgp Ray Soucy (Sep 15)
- Re: vyatta for bgp Tom Hill (Sep 13)