Re: ouch..

[James Jones <james () freedomnet co nz>]

On 9/14/11 2:46 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 09:24:25AM +1200, Don Gould wrote:
> > How many of you have sat and thought about the merit of this web site?
> Ok, I'll take a swing at your list...
>
> > * Does Juniper break promises?
> Yes.
>
> > * Does Cisco break them?
> Yes.
>
> > * What bad things and experiences have you had with Cisco, Juniper?
> It might take me several days, and many pages to compile that list.
>
> > * What is the best technology for each company?
> Cisco: The AGS+ was ahead of its time.
> Jiniper: The Olive is quite nifty.
>
> > * Did you know that Cisco has a 100Gb solution?
> Yes, but I can't afford it.
>
> Now, with that out of the way, how much does everyone else hate even the
> thought of NAT444?
>
> :) :) :)

Just the thought of NAT444 makes my stomach turn.