nanog mailing list archives
Re: ouch..
From: Don Gould <don () bowenvale co nz>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:52:31 +1200
On 15/09/2011 9:46 a.m., Leo Bicknell wrote:
Now, with that out of the way, how much does everyone else hate even the thought of NAT444?
Clearly some hate it enough to go to the trouble of making a 'we think they suck' web site in an attempt to draw readers in a different direction.
Now with respect to your list... I'm sure there will be many that will be quite interested to see it, so Monday?
:) Beer D
Current thread:
- Re: ouch.., (continued)
- Re: ouch.. Michael DeMan (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. David Swafford (Sep 18)
- Re: ouch.. Ahmed Maged (Sep 18)
- Re: ouch.. Paul (Sep 14)
- RE: ouch.. Leigh Porter (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. James Jones (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Scott Weeks (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Michael Hare (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Don Gould (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Leo Bicknell (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Don Gould (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. James Jones (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Mark Gauvin (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Leigh Porter (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Leigh Porter (Sep 15)
- Re: ouch.. Joel jaeggli (Sep 17)