nanog mailing list archives

Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers

From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:38:17 -0400

On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:17:22 -0000, Brian Johnson said:

So... I'm in complete agreement with your statement, but The Wikipedia reference is not pertinent.


So I point out the tragedy of the commons, you agree with it, but the Wikipedia
reference that talks about the same exact thing isn't pertinent?  How does that
follow? :)

Attachment: _bin
Description:

Current thread:

Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers, (continued)
- - - Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Douglas Otis (Oct 25)
    - Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Scott Howard (Oct 26)
    - Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Owen DeLong (Oct 26)
    - Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Bjørn Mork (Oct 27)
    - RE: Outgoing SMTP Servers Brian Johnson (Oct 27)
    - Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 27)
    - Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Robert Bonomi (Oct 27)
    - RE: Outgoing SMTP Servers Brian Johnson (Oct 27)
    - Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers William Herrin (Oct 27)
    - RE: Outgoing SMTP Servers Brian Johnson (Oct 27)
    - Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 27)
    - Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Pete Carah (Oct 27)
    - Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers William Herrin (Oct 27)
    - Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Dave CROCKER (Oct 27)
    - Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers William Herrin (Oct 27)
    - Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Joel jaeggli (Oct 27)
    - Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers William Herrin (Oct 28)
    - Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers -Hammer- (Oct 28)
    - Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Jay Ashworth (Oct 28)
    - Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Dave CROCKER (Oct 30)
    - Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Brian Johnson (Oct 30)

(Thread continues...)