nanog mailing list archives
Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests
From: Paul Graydon <paul () paulgraydon co uk>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:15:19 -1000
On 10/25/2011 08:43 AM, Christopher Pilkington wrote:
For colo? No, filtering is the customers concern, unless failure to do so is causing a problem for the colo network. Such services are almost always paid for add-ons to a colo package. The colocation business is usually fairly low on the profit margin with most companies trying to get away with the bare minimum possible over and above the basics.Is it common in the industry for a colocation provider, when requested to put an egress ACL facing us such as: deny udp any a.b.c.d/24 eq 80 …to refuse and tell us we must subscribe to their managed DDOS product? -cjp
Current thread:
- Colocation providers and ACL requests Christopher Pilkington (Oct 25)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Keegan Holley (Oct 25)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Brandon Galbraith (Oct 25)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Christopher Pilkington (Oct 25)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests PC (Oct 25)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Keegan Holley (Oct 25)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Brandon Galbraith (Oct 25)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Keegan Holley (Oct 25)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests William Herrin (Oct 25)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Paul Graydon (Oct 25)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Keegan Holley (Oct 25)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Jay Ashworth (Oct 25)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Keegan Holley (Oct 26)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Jay Ashworth (Oct 26)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Keegan Holley (Oct 27)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Keegan Holley (Oct 25)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Christopher J. Pilkington (Oct 26)
- Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests Mike Gatti (Oct 30)