nanog mailing list archives

Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests


From: Paul Graydon <paul () paulgraydon co uk>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:15:19 -1000

On 10/25/2011 08:43 AM, Christopher Pilkington wrote:
Is it common in the industry for a colocation provider, when requested to put an egress ACL facing us such as:

   deny udp any a.b.c.d/24 eq 80

…to refuse and tell us we must subscribe to their managed DDOS product?

-cjp


For colo? No, filtering is the customers concern, unless failure to do so is causing a problem for the colo network. Such services are almost always paid for add-ons to a colo package. The colocation business is usually fairly low on the profit margin with most companies trying to get away with the bare minimum possible over and above the basics.


Current thread: