nanog mailing list archives
[routing-wg] The Cidr Report
From: Kyle Creyts <kyle.creyts () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 01:35:51 -0400
I may not read it for the purpose of aggregation, but it is useful data to me for other purposes. As long as there is one person talking and at least one person listening, a thread is in order, and it isn't spam. On Oct 15, 2011 3:25 PM, "Geoff Huston" <gih () apnic net> wrote:
From what I learned at the latest NANOG it's very clear that nobody reads this any more. Is there any good reason to persist in spamming the nanog list with this report? thanks, Geoff
Current thread:
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (Oct 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (Oct 14)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Geoff Huston (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 15)
- [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Kyle Creyts (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report James McMurry (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Geoff Huston (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Geoff Huston (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Simon Leinen (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Hank Nussbacher (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Graham Beneke (Oct 16)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Jay Ashworth (Oct 16)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Bjoern A. Zeeb (Oct 16)