nanog mailing list archives
Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () efes iucc ac il>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:26:17 +0200 (IST)
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Simon Leinen wrote: Ditto here. -Hank
Geoff Huston writes:Does anyone give a s**t about this any more?I do; I check the weekly increase every week, and check who the top offenders are. If someone from my vicinity/circles is on the list (doesn't happen frequently; more often for the BGP updates report than for CIDR), I may send them a note and ask what happened.From what I learned at the latest NANOG it's very clear that nobody reads this any more."Reads" may be an exaggeration, but I'm sure some look at it.Is there any good reason to persist in spamming the nanog list with this report?I think it still provides an incentive for people not to mess things up too badly; and a chance of some mishaps to be noticed quicker, with a little help from your friends.
Current thread:
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (Oct 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (Oct 14)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Geoff Huston (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Randy Bush (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 15)
- [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Kyle Creyts (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report James McMurry (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Geoff Huston (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Geoff Huston (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Simon Leinen (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Hank Nussbacher (Oct 15)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Graham Beneke (Oct 16)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Jay Ashworth (Oct 16)
- Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report Bjoern A. Zeeb (Oct 16)