nanog mailing list archives
Re: 23,000 IP addresses
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 10:22:03 -0400
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Scott Brim <scott.brim () gmail com> wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 09:42, Leigh Porter <leigh.porter () ukbroadband com> wrote:So are they basing this on you downloading it or on making it available for others?Without knowing the details, I wouldn't assume any such level of competence or integrity. It could just be a broad witch hunt.
I know of a decent sized global ISP that ran (runs?) a large darknet that was the equivalent of a few /16's routed to a fbsd host running 'tcpdump' (a tad more complex, but essentially this). BayTSP (one of the 'make legal threats for the mpaa/riaa' firms) sent ~2k notes to the ISP about downloaders on these ips. Looking at netflow data (sample 1:1 on that interface) they had portscanned (from ip space registered in their name) each address in the range and sent subpoena-material to all ips that they thought they got a response from. At least baytsp got theirs? (money I mean)
Current thread:
- 23,000 IP addresses Marshall Eubanks (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses chip (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Roland Perry (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Marshall Eubanks (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Roland Perry (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Roland Perry (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Jon Lewis (May 10)
- RE: 23,000 IP addresses Baklarz, Ron (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Leigh Porter (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Scott Brim (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Christopher Morrow (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses William Pitcock (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Christopher Morrow (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses chip (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Michael Holstein (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Christopher Morrow (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Jimmy Hess (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Robert Bonomi (May 12)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses David Conrad (May 12)