nanog mailing list archives
Re: [v6z] The growth of municipal broadband networks
From: Scott Howard <scott () doc net au>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 00:38:05 -0700
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Paul Graydon <paul () paulgraydon co uk>wrote:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/03/133-us-cities-now-run-their-own-broadband-networks.ars Ars Technica has a short article up about the growth of municipal networks, but principally a nice little 'hey check out this website' ( http://www.muninetworks.org/communitymap) The whole scenario around municipal broadband networks in a hopefully unbiased nutshell: Increasing numbers cities and counties seem to be getting frustrated with what they see as the lack of progress in broadband speeds from their incumbent provider(s) (even after incumbent provider(s) have been approached requesting faster speeds) and are deciding to do it themselves.
Whilst that's certainly true for some areas, it's definitely not the case for all of the areas marked on that map. The only entry for the SF Bay area is San Bruno, where the municipal-owned cable provider *is* the incumbent, and has been for the past 30 years. Not only are they the incumbent, but they are also a monopoly who have blocked competition, resulting in higher prices than in much of the rest of the bay area. Scott (Happily no longer living in San Bruno)
Current thread:
- Re: The growth of municipal broadband networks, (continued)
- Re: The growth of municipal broadband networks Joly MacFie (Mar 25)
- Re: The growth of municipal broadband networks Richard Bennett (Mar 25)
- Re: The growth of municipal broadband networks Joly MacFie (Mar 25)
- Re: The growth of municipal broadband networks Richard Bennett (Mar 26)
- Re: The growth of municipal broadband networks Joly MacFie (Mar 26)
- Re: The growth of municipal broadband networks Joly MacFie (Mar 26)
- Re: The growth of municipal broadband networks Jeff Wheeler (Mar 25)
- Re: The growth of municipal broadband networks Jay Ashworth (Mar 26)