nanog mailing list archives
Re: Regional AS model
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:40:23 -0600
Sent from my iPad On Mar 24, 2011, at 12:42 PM, Zaid Ali <zaid () zaidali com> wrote:
I have seen age old discussions on single AS vs multiple AS for backbone and datacenter design. I am particularly interested in operational challenges for running AS per region e.g. one AS for US, one EU etc or I have heard folks do one AS per DC. I particularly don't see any advantage in doing one AS per region or datacenter since most of the reasons I hear is to reduce the iBGP mesh. I generally prefer one AS and making use of confederation. Zaid
If you have good backbone between the locations, then, it's mostly a matter of personal preference. If you have discreet autonomous sites that are not connected by internal circuits (not VPNs), then, AS per site is greatly preferable. Owen
Current thread:
- Regional AS model Zaid Ali (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Owen DeLong (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Bill Woodcock (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Michael Hallgren (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Christopher LILJENSTOLPE (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Zaid Ali (Mar 25)
- Re: Regional AS model Michael Hallgren (Mar 25)
- Re: Regional AS model Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Owen DeLong (Mar 25)
- Re: Regional AS model Owen DeLong (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model David Freedman (Mar 25)
- Re: Regional AS model Owen DeLong (Mar 25)
- Re: Regional AS model Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 26)