nanog mailing list archives

Re: CSI New York fake IPv6


From: Ina Faye-Lund <starcat () starcat rlyeh net>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:25:33 +0100

On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 06:35:35PM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mar 20, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:44:50 +1100, Skeeve Stevens said:

http://www.eintellego.net/public/CSINY.s07e17-fakev6.jpg

Promoting IPv6 = Win!
Dodgy Address = Fail!

Intentional Fail, probably, similar to how most phone numbers on a TV show are
in the 555 exchange. You put a number on TV, and drunk idiots will call it, as
a number of annoyed people found out after Tommy Tutone had an actual hit
song...  257 seems to be a popular octet value.

(Personally, I'm surprised 148.18.1.193 got used in that image)

So am I.  But I'm surprised 1918 space was used as well.  ANY v4 address will get typed into ping or a browser or 
something by someone if it is on TV.  How many corporations have 1918 space that their VPN'ed home users are about to 
abuse because of that?

Is 127.0.0.1 / ::1 the Internet version of "555"?  Or will "I hurt myself, so now I'm going to sue you" mean we can't 
even use that?

I would have used 192.0.2.0/24.  It is the IPv4 version of example.com.

-- 
Ina


Current thread: