nanog mailing list archives
Re: CSI New York fake IPv6
From: Martin Millnert <millnert () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 02:04:30 -0400
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick () ianai net> wrote:
Is 127.0.0.1 / ::1 the Internet version of "555"?
Not according to the RFC:s. Given the use of "555" in the (North American) TV world, and the regularity with which IETF defines specific example resources of various sorts, one would almost expect there'd be "555"-equivalent address spaces defined by the IETF already. I assume it has been discussed and rejected. Can anyone enlighten us on why? Regards, Martin PS. It's quite obvious that it would be announced and point to HTTP servers serving responses containing various evil things, I guess? PPS. Didn't know Adobe made web browsers with remote connect clients in them. :)
Current thread:
- CSI New York fake IPv6 Skeeve Stevens (Mar 20)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 20)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 20)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Jay Ashworth (Mar 20)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Jeff Wheeler (Mar 20)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Paul Timmins (Mar 20)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Martin Millnert (Mar 20)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Nick Hilliard (Mar 21)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Fred Baker (Mar 21)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 20)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Ina Faye-Lund (Mar 21)
- RE: CSI New York fake IPv6 George Bonser (Mar 21)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 20)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Tony Finch (Mar 21)
- RE: CSI New York fake IPv6 Stefan Fouant (Mar 20)
- Re: CSI New York fake IPv6 Jay Ashworth (Mar 20)